It is often said and believed that there are countries where investors can invest and what they should not. In fact, many investors have been paranoid about investing in some countries.And nothing in this world to let them invest in a number of countries outside their own country. Unfortunately, the investment environment more difficult, dangerous and competitive investments that investors should vote their nets wider to the shore as they remain liquid and not to end hunger. This is more so against the backdrop of the global financial crisis has proved that no country is immune to the financial collapse and investment, whatever the level of development.

The advice in conservative investment environments before, some countries are virtually immune to crash through their investments matured culture, transparency, fairness of the parties and strict regulations that guarantee return on investment. Against this background will invest in Africa, Asia and Latin America for example are not easily embraced, given the general investment climate and the level of policy frameworks in such environments.Unfortunately, data and experience now suggest that these emerging markets, and they hold tremendous prospects for the future of the investment and any investment that is in question.Cases of Brazil, India and China somewhat proven this point.

The issue to deal with now is that if these ‘risky investments’ jurisdictions huge business opportunities for bold investors and real, how to profitably invest in this investment? Here are some things that investors should make sure to investing, no matter what country / area of the levels of development of the country / state / city and even village.

1. Investors should review the location of the critical investments.The study is not just about professional feasibility studies which will be full of jargon that are known to fail. The study should both professional investors and rudimentary and / or their representatives have the streets to ask / ordinary people study the dynamics of investing in their countries go. Critical stakeholders in government, business and politics has yet to be appointed to informally get their candid views and opinions on the investment climate prevailing in such domains.

2. Investors should be free of stereotypes and prejudices about the place of investment. A lot of prejudices and stereotypes are spread investments across sectors in some places and some investors will not invest in these places. The good news is that most of these prejudices and stereotypes are not true in most cases.

3. Investors must be patient and calculating if they have to invest in new places. Many rush into investing in new locations due to bandwagon effects. Many rush into new jurisdictions and investment portfolios because it is the ‘in thing’ and ‘new deal in town. Not because they have weighed the trajectories professional information and even socio-cultural factors and other forces include informal.

4. After investing, investors should also be patient to see their investment needs before the draft and labeled as a bad investment. Not that they are so much in a hurry to sell off the investment after a small shock or failure.

With the above issues, the most profitable investment is likely in any environment. This includes both old and new, well developed and undeveloped land.